Mixed reactions to Land Reform Bill consultation.

The Scottish Government’s land reform proposals have sparked mixed responses, with contrasting viewpoints on how these measures can impact land availability and the future of rural communities.

The Scottish Land Commission, in its submission to the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee, expressed support for the proposed Land Reform Bill. The Commission believes that the legislation has the potential to tackle long-standing issues related to concentrated land ownership in Scotland.

Michael Russell, the chair of the Scottish Land Commission, highlighted the significance of measures like lotting, which involves dividing larger land units for sale. According to Russell, these steps could address the adverse effects of concentrated land ownership, promoting transparency and community involvement in land use planning.

Emphasising the need for systemic change, Russell also underscored the importance of complementary reforms in areas such as tax policies, community rights to buy, and the role of public land. The Commission’s research and recommendations aim to address the challenges associated with concentrated land ownership and promote sustainable land management practices.

However, Scottish Land & Estates presented a contrasting view, describing the Land Reform Bill as a risky venture that could jeopardise rural communities and hinder investments in transitioning to a net-zero economy. In their submission, the organisation pointed out several perceived flaws in the government’s proposals.

• The interference with large landholdings could impact various projects, including housing, renewable energy, and carbon sequestration schemes.
• Concerns were raised about the reliance on conjecture rather than evidence in certain key measures of the bill.
• The potential negative repercussions on existing financial agreements and land management practices were highlighted.

Sarah-Jane Laing, the chief executive of Scottish Land & Estates, expressed concerns about the possible ramifications of breaking up large-scale landholdings on rural communities and the environment. The organisation stressed the importance of maintaining the positive outcomes associated with managing land at scale.

While acknowledging the need for transparency and responsible investment in natural capital, Scottish Land & Estates argued that the proposed measures could lead to uncertainty and conflict, ultimately hindering positive outcomes for land management and ownership.

As the debate around the Land Reform Bill continues, it remains essential for stakeholders to engage in constructive dialogue and seek common ground to address the challenges of land ownership and usage in Scotland. Balancing the interests of various stakeholders while promoting sustainable land management practices will be critical in shaping the future of Scotland’s rural communities and environment.